Characteristics Matthew Mark John Luke
of the story 26:6-13 14:3-9 12:1-8
Town
Whose Home? Simon the Simon the doesn’t say Simon
the
Leper Leper Pharisee
Year of Jesus’ 3rd 3rd 3rd 2nd
Ministry
Critics Identity All disciples “some” Judas
Iscariot, Simon the
“Simon’s
son” Pharisee
Critic’s Response waste; should waste; should waste; should if
Jesus was really
be
given to be given to be given to a prophet, then He would
poor. poor. poor. know this woman was a
sinner.
Jesus’ Response for my burial for my burial for my burial parable
of debtor;
this woman has done what you
did not do for me
The Woman “a woman” “a woman” Mary, sister of a
“woman in the city” of
Lazarus and Nain who was “a sinner.”
Martha
Actions recorded poured on poured on anointed feet anointed
feet of Jesus;
His head His head of Jesus also with her tears
________________________________________________________________________
Deductions and Further
Relevant Study:
Matthew, Mark, and John’s accounts are of the same story because their location, year of ministry, and responses are identical. Luke’s account is a separate, unrelated event for the same reasons. Mary Magdalene NEVER poured out an alabaster box upon Jesus in scripture. Furthermore, all of the most popular and respected commentaries agree to those conclusions (see Barnes’ Notes; Adam Clarke’s Commentary; Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Commentary, The Pulpit Commentary, and Matthew Henry’s Commentary amongst many others). Moreover, all available commentaries written by authors that are affiliated with the United Pentecostal Church International, agree that Luke’s account is a separate event and that Mary Magdalene was never involved in an alabaster box anointing of Jesus in scripture (see The Gospel According to Mark by Sidney L. Poe, and John – the Gospel that had to be written by Fred E. Kinzie).
The coincidences in names and common resulting confusions from the casual reader of these scriptures are not surprising considering the following facts:
There are at least six different women named “Mary” mentioned in scripture:
1. Mary the mother of Jesus Matthew 13:55
2. Mary Magdalene, or literally: Mary of Magdala Luke 8:2-3
3. Mary, sister of
Lazarus and Martha from
4. Mary, mother of James and Joses (Joseph) Matthew 27:55-61
5. Mary, the mother of John Mark Acts 12:12
6. Mary, of the church in Rome Romans 16:6
There is also mentioned a “Mary of Cleophas”
in John 19:25, and most scholars believe from comparing that scripture with
Matthew 27:55-61 above that she is the same as “Mary the mother of James and
Joseph.” If that is true, then “Mary,
mother of James and Joseph” was Jesus’ aunt (the Jesus’ mother’s older sister –
John
Just to make the “name game” fun, let’s recap. All of the above means that Jesus had a mother named Mary, an aunt named Mary, a friend named Mary, a convert named Mary, and two other women actively involved in the Early Apostolic Church named Mary as well! Jesus also had a brother named James, a cousin named James who was a disciple, another disciple named James, and an ancestor named James (when you consider that the Hebrew rendering for “James” is “Jacob”). Jesus also had a father named Joseph, a cousin named Joseph, three direct ancestors named Joseph, including a great-great-great-great-great-grandfather, a disciple named Joseph (Acts 1:23-25) who ended up being not chosen to replace Judas Iscariot even though he was eligible, and a friend named Joseph of Arimathea who provided the tomb from which He was resurrected.
For what it’s worth, there are no less than six “Judas’” in scripture:
1. Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Jesus Christ
2. Judas, the brother of Jesus Christ, who later went by “Jude” Matthew 13:55
3. Judas, the other disciple of Christ, surnamed Thaddeus John 14:22
4. Judas of
5. Judas of
6. Judas surnamed Barsabbas who was minister in the Acts 15:22
Early Church.
With all of this in mind, is there any wonder why so many people confuse the identities of the characters involved in the accounts of the alabaster box stories!? One more “name study” provides further insight into understanding and “keeping straight” the scriptural record of these events.
There are no less than nine Simons mentioned in scripture:
1. Simon Peter
2. Simon the Zealot one of the twelve Matthew 10:4
3. Simon, the brother of Jesus Christ Matthew 13:55
4. Simon the Leper in
5. Simon the
6. Simon the Pharisee in Nain (1st alabaster box account) Luke 7:40
7. Simon the father of Judas Iscariot John 6:71
8. Simon the Sorcerer Acts 8:9
9. Simon the Tanner
with whom Peter lodged Acts
We know for certain that Judas Iscariot was from Judea because “Iscariot” means “man of Kerioth” and we know that Kerioth was a town in southern Judea (Joshua 15:25) and therefore nowhere near Galilee and the city of Nain. That proves to us that Simon the Pharisee and Simon the Father of Judas Iscariot are NOT the same person.
It is possible but not provable
that the alabaster box account in
Conclusions:
To really make this study practical we will present the information above in relation with commonly preached and believed statements and then comment on their truthfulness.
Statement: Mary Magdalene was caught in the act of adultery, forgiven by Jesus Christ, and thus broke the alabaster box in worship because of her great gratitude toward Jesus for His mercy.
Answer: False!
There is absolutely NO evidence to link Mary Magdalene as the woman in
either of the Alabaster box stories, whether it be the
sinner woman in Luke 7 or the incident in
Statement: Judas Iscariot was the son of a Pharisee.
Answer: False!
This is another errant deduction resulting from confusing the two separate
alabaster box accounts. Simon the
Pharisee’s house was in Nain,
Statement: Simon the Leper was a man who Jesus had cleansed who became a Pharisee or a Pharisee who had become a Leper who Jesus had cleansed.
Answer: It’s possible that Simon the Leper was someone who Jesus had cleansed but there is absolutely NO scriptural record of this. The other parts of this statement are false. Simon the Leper and Simon the Pharisee lived in two separate towns over a hundred miles apart and the events happened in two different years of Jesus’ ministry. They were two different people. Besides that fact, surely if Jesus had done such a notable miracle as cleanse a Pharisee who had become leprous, the scriptures would not only have recorded that fact clearly, but the Pharisee would have responded to Jesus differently than Simon the Pharisee did in Luke 7. Remember that Luke was a physician and often detailed the diseases that Jesus cured in greater detail than the other Gospel writers so it would seem strange indeed if Simon the Pharisee had been healed of such a dreaded disease and Luke not mention that fact in his story.
Statement: Mary the sister of Lazarus was a sinner and approached Jesus through a crowd of mockers under the shame of her sin.
Answer: False! This again, confuses the two separate accounts of an alabaster box being poured out upon Jesus. Scripture never refers to Mary, the sister of Lazarus as “a sinner.” It was the woman in Luke 7 that was “a sinner.” Mary was a sinner in the sense that all of us are sinners, but if you define “sinner” as “someone actively living in willful sin and not trusting in Jesus” then this statement is false. Jesus was a common guest in Mary’s home and she is nowhere mentioned as being a woman of “ill repute” or “easy morals.”
Statement: Mary wept as she anointed Jesus’ feet with the ointment from her alabaster box.
Answer: False! It was the sinner woman of Luke 7 that wept and shed “tears.” There is no scriptural record of Mary having wept while she anointed Jesus’ head and feet for His burial.